Which statement about Taft's trust-busting record is accurate?

Which statement about Taft's trust-busting record is accurate?

• A. He prosecuted more anti-trust cases than Roosevelt, though many were not widely publicized.
• B. He reduced anti-trust enforcement and let big corporations operate freely.
• C. He avoided enforcing anti-trust laws and expanded government inaction.
• D. He created new antitrust agencies to dominate the economy.

Answer: (A)

Taft’s trust-busting record is defined by quantity and courtroom strategy rather than fanfare. He pursued a larger slate of antitrust cases under the Sherman Act than Roosevelt did, targeting major consolidations and using the courts and consent decrees to dismantle or regulate powerful trusts. This more legalistic, behind-the-scenes approach produced many prosecutions that didn’t capture as much public attention, but it shows a sustained, formal enforcement of trust-busting principles. This fits because the other statements mischaracterize his approach: Taft did not scale back antitrust enforcement or avoid enforcing the laws, and he did not establish new agencies intended to dominate the economy.

Taft’s trust-busting record is defined by quantity and courtroom strategy rather than fanfare. He pursued a larger slate of antitrust cases under the Sherman Act than Roosevelt did, targeting major consolidations and using the courts and consent decrees to dismantle or regulate powerful trusts. This more legalistic, behind-the-scenes approach produced many prosecutions that didn’t capture as much public attention, but it shows a sustained, formal enforcement of trust-busting principles.

This fits because the other statements mischaracterize his approach: Taft did not scale back antitrust enforcement or avoid enforcing the laws, and he did not establish new agencies intended to dominate the economy.